Its lightweight construction conserves both memory and CPU cycles. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. raw download clone embed print report. Bash 8.10 KB . It would be no surprise that I prefer Xfce at the moment For me the configurability of Xfce and its ease of use outweigh any speed benefits that may come from using Openbox. Openbox is a window manager, XFCE is a desktop environment, how can you compare those? Manjaro: Xfce vs Openbox (packages) soldier9599. The Xfce desktop is thin and fast with an overall elegance that makes it easy to figure out how to do things. LTS strategy. Link_ 2 avril 2009 à 19:59:36. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while … For such … I really hope that Philip gives us a final release with both Openbox and Xfce. Easy to maintain but can also be customised to some extent if needed. A desktop environment is a collection of software designed to give functionality and a certain look and feel to an operating system.. Xfce brings more friendliness and gives a more full-desktop experience. LXDE vs Xfce Let's have a look at the desktops... Xfce desktop... LXDE desktop... Now as you can see the desktops look a lot similar. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. Copyright © 2012 CrunchBang Linux. This way will be able to choose either one, change when we're bored or facilitate our home/family users with an friendler desktop. Linux Mint MATE. Anyhow both these desktops actually come with a rich desktop right … We can say that this desktop environment looks like Windows 10, and for daily use we recommend you to use Cinnamon version for modern computer. Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on GNOME. Openbox has a steeper learning curve, in so much as it is considerably different in scope than Windows. If you can live without those, Openbox just … When I run: You can use Openbox with XFCE environment. Unfortunately, the same is far from true of KDE applications, which can take 15-20 seconds to open. 769 100 . Conclusion. Openbox inside Xfce. sticks with openbox, users may wish to go omn's route. And about DE's having a lot of redundencies, I don't see that with xfce. tags: Enlightenment Openbox XFCE. I missed the topic-add new button, paying not to much attention to it. Currently PCLOS Openbox on one laptop, have to update hardware on the D630, it appears, but has Salix64 xfce on it at the moment. i3, Cinnamon, and KDE are probably your best bets out of the 6 options considered. Performance wise, I notice no real difference between it and Openbox on my machine, and it comes with more built in tools and simple GUIs that small changes that need to be made can be handled a little quicker (for me). Let me answer the rest of your questions @2 JWM is not based on anything. XFCE is a great DE, it's lightweight and user-friendly. But currently I'm using wmii and it's great. I used to be an XFCE-fan, but OpenBox has proven to be more efficient and less "in my way" . Compiz: This is without a doubt the most visually impressive window manager available for Linux. In short, in the terminal type : openbox --replace This will replace XFCE's default window manager XFWM with Openbox (assuming you've already installed Openbox of course). I started out using fluxbox, then changed to openbox. Though XFCE4 is an excellent desktop environment, it’s window manager isn’t as great. My Rec ommendation for Openbox. becomes a debian testing build for the next release, there is also a chance it may switch to XFCE. Lxpanel solves  a lot  problems with openbox for newbies.I probably lose my interest in Crunch if it turns away from Openbox. Linux Mint 17.3 features Xfce 4.12, MDM 2.0, a Linux kernel 3.19 and an Ubuntu 14.04 package base. That's all they give you for a text editor. I should have set more test partitions, but didn't, and I'm seeing many posts of people using XFCE, but I don't have a machine available right now to test it. It's a nice DE, very adequate. Manjaro, on the other hand, provides different ISO for desktop environments like Xfce, KDE and GNOME. Manjaro also offers GNOME and KDE Plasma variants. Until 2016, future versions of Linux Mint will use the same package base as Linux Mint 17.3, making it trivial for people to upgrade. And then there's just these small differences in how Xfce and LXDE (and LXQt) function. I've recently installed oS 12.2 in an old celeron test machine, so that I chose LXDE. raw download clone embed print report. ☁️ Get $100 in credit toward deploying your very own Linux servers on Linode! That means installing Openbox won't give you easy menu access to wallpaper options, a taskbar or system panel, or most of those other doo-dads. With XFCE, you can have those BUT at the cost of the deskmenu. Openbox … When I do this, Xfce flickers for a moment as the terminal closes and sends me back to the desktop, but nothing has changed. Xfce can also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager. Xfce vs. MATE. There was an option in the menu to switch to "openbox" so I did that to see what happened. I was going to give up, and you gave me the exact answers. I used Mate and xfce for a couple of days (with load averages of just .1 -.3 )and went back to cinnamon. Including: Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE, and Openbox. It is written from the scratch. The difference is on behaviour and philosophy. On the other hand, Openbox uses a very little amount of memory and is very minimalistic (as a DE). The official Manjaro editions are based on XFCE, KDE, and GNOME Desktops. Again, very customizable and fast. It harkens back to the days of Gnome 2 for ease and capability to customize the desktop. If you want to use the Openbox root-menu instead of Xfce's, (right click over the desktop) you could terminate Xfdesktop by running the following command in a terminal: xfdesktop --quit The bad news is that Xfdesktop manages the wallpaper and desktop icons, so you should use other tools for that purpose (check the FAQ for some ideas). There are distros with the LXDE so I think vrkalak means having Openbox by itself. Pour certains utilisateurs de Linux, les performances sont primordiales. With the final release of Fedora 24 arriving on Tuesday, I've installed each of the six desktops on a … It uses the GTK+ toolkit, just like the more popular GNOME interface that serves as the default for Ubuntu and Fedora (two of the largest Linux-based desktops out there). So, the XFCE is the best desktop, right? I'm curious about how Mint has modified Xfce to make it as awesome as I've heard. The most important reason people chose i3 is: One of the biggest attractions of i3 is … The script … MATE comes with more features than Xfce. If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with. Previous … Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features! If you are feeling adventurous and want to install additional DEs or WMs you can reference these guides: Install Desktop Environments and Window Managers Dec 6th, 2014. I was using xfburn as burning software, thunar as a file manager (basically for the volume manager) And I like how quickly apps load on XFCE. It aims to be fast and low on system resources, while still being visually appealing and user friendly. This should produce the openbox setting complete with the openbox root menu, but still leaves xfce4-session in charge. But, I mostly, use my own version of Debian Squeeze 'testing' with Xfce. Currently PCLOS Openbox on one laptop, have to update hardware on the D630, it appears, but has Salix64 xfce … Got Leenucks? Specs. Last edited by cry0x (2007-06-27 08:15:03). Last edited by pablokal (2010-03-01 21:42:01). Yeah, nobody here can decide for you which one you'll like better, so as said above it's best for you to try XFCE and decide for yourself. I then proceed to log out, checking the box as instructed, and log back in. Écrit entièrement en langage C et distribué sous la licence GPL, la plus grande particularité de ce gestionnaire de fenêtres réside dans ses possibilités de configuration quasi infinies.Cet article explique comment faire ses premiers pas … Also, have an install of Crunchbang/Linux, also, based on Ubuntu but with the Openbox. For me, I have a soft spot in my heart for the XFCE … Openbox. Manjaro: Xfce vs Openbox (packages) soldier9599. Openbox: This is a very fast and very light window manager. I like both. There is no noticeable difference between both openbox or xfwm, both are fast and efficient, small memory footprint, performance wise, perhaps openbox is slightly lighter. Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. Specs. I would assume that you're running Openbox in the first place because you're a minimalist?Here's how it goes for me: *Install Archlinux*Install Openbox*Wonder if I would want more features of _____ DE*Install XFCE, GNOME, or KDE*Cry at bloat*Remove XFCE, GNOME, or KDE*Install Openbox. Such differences might matter immensely if you are a compulsive customizer, or not at all if you tend to accept your desktop environment the way you find it. I like the concept behind LXDE, but think that it still needs some work to be brought up to the level of either XFCE or a set up Openbox. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. These two lists show packages that are exclusive to the Xfce and Openbox versions of Manjaro, relative to each other. Cinnamon, Openbox, Awesome, BSPWM, Budgie, MATE and i3 are Manjaro community editions; The official/ flagship editions are supported by the core team of Manjaro Linux. Some individuals in various forums have made the claim that LXDE is more "modular", and therefore easier to develop for than XFCE. Not a member of Pastebin yet? My personal preference for a production environment (i.e. I am not a programer and I wonder if it would be possible to implement an openbox-like right-click menuinto XFCE? I like the features Openbox provides (especially the pipe menus), so it looks like a great marriage to me . Hosted by Linode. Vraiment, quand il s'agit de MATE vs Xfce, vous êtes du genre à se faire couper les cheveux. One function only, but does it as well as it possibly can. Selecting among these two is very difficult. I really have no complaints about it, but I'm interested in trying something new. Second, exit out of the Xfce session, and make sure to tick the checkbox that says "Save session for future login." If you want something more user-friendly and with fancy menus, go with XFCE. To see application icons, you must create a .desktop file in the Desktop folder. Seems to me that XFCE is doing a good job with the GNU philosophy. that will tell you more in 10 minutes than you'll find out from what anyone else says about it. Things like log-out, shutdown, etc in openbox root menu are formulated for lxsession. Who is this doin' this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'? More automation, utilities, plugins, eye-candy and a better overall integration complete the whole package. This is especially the case if Xfce is run without the Xfce goodies meta plugin package (I only run a couple of extra plugins). Whereas, community edition are supported by open source enthusiasts … :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Similarly, I always return to Archlinux for the same reason: *Install Archlinux*Wonder if I would prefer apt-get over pacman*Install Debian*Cry at bloat*Remove Debian*Install Arch. If you prefer GTK+, you’re better off using Xfce. It has some nice features like changing desktops when cursor reacher screen edge. This makes it ideal for older hosts with few resources to spare for a desktop. It was fun at first but now I just want something that works out of box. I also have some older machines with OpenBox and LXDE too. or use the. "Configuration allows multi-monitor support" is the primary reason people pick i3 over the competition. By native window tiling I mean that we will be using only the native commands of a particular window manager and not any external program. Server: acrobat, Enter your search query in the box above ^, When comparing i3 vs Openbox, the Slant community recommends i3 for most people. Older laptops with … With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. Dec 6th, 2014. Openbox is faster, configurable, simply like it better. Your lightweight desktop … Enjoy! That changed the menu I see whren I right-click the Desktop. I find the Xfce desktop to be more flexible and configurable than KDE, and a lot easier to customize! Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. XFCE, KDE, Cinnamon, Budgie and Gnome are Beginner Friendly. I recently made the switch from openbox to xfce, and I really like it. [AIDE] Choix entre Openbox et XFCE Liste des forums; Rechercher dans le forum. OpenBox solves that problem by being vastly superior … free. I prefer Xfce myself but if they get as crazed as, for instance, KDE has always been and Gnome has become, I will have OB on in a hurry. ... and if anybody has heared of an attempt to do that, might be just a dream cause I like XFCE but do not want to miss my right-click menu. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. Top Pro ••• Extremely lightweight. Trying XFCE I just missed things. For instance Openbox+Xfce panel is a killer combo for people who like more or less full desktop environment. Le meilleur environnement de bureau Linux Lean vs LXDE vs Xfce vs MATE. Compton: This compositing manager can be used in complement of Marco, Metacity, Xfwm4 or Openbox. Desktop flavors available via Manjaro Architect. ... (For openbox, which brings no file manager, the gtk2 version of pcmanfm is used) The memory usage of LXQt is quite similar to the original LXDE (gtk2) while many new features are added. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that’s only part of the story. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. There is no noticeable difference between both openbox or xfwm, both are fast and efficient, small memory footprint, performance wise, perhaps openbox is slightly lighter. Openbox is a lightweight window manager that uses a little over 100MB RAM upon boot. I've noticed a lot of members have switched over to xfce with an openbox feel on debian testing via omn's DTX. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Check out a CrunchBang 8.04 Live CD... it has both Openbox and Xfce desktops, so you can do a true "A/B test" with the same kernel, applications, etc. So my question is, what are the differences between openbox and xfce, with regards to performance?Even if #! Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. Xfce. Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. not a rig just to play with) is XFCE. Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc. But, whatever the case, you might want to draw up a list of must-have … I think the big contender right now is XFCE, but I was wondering if anyone has experience with both and can maybe compare the two? Xfce also doesn't include the integration like Gnome like clicking on the clock to get your calendar and notifications. You certainly can use Openbox in Xfce as the window manager. You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: Though XFCE4 is an excellent desktop environment, it’s window manager isn’t as great. Openbox is a window manager, not a desktop environment. Seriously, just try it, it's hardly difficult to install and have a play. From the terminal, issue the following command: user $ killall xfwm4 ; openbox & exit. 2. If you want something more user-friendly and with fancy menus, go with XFCE. Bash 8.10 KB . Desktop. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. Never . However, Xfce does not use Openbox as the window manager when I do this. A good place to see a very nice OTB OpenBox install is to get a CD from Manjaro (Arch based). LXDE was once my favorite, but don't use anymore. 26 juin 2011 By jdn06. Each desktop experience can offer something that is a bit useful to me and may help me to use each machine as I see that it is fit. or (b) make a post asking everyone else to do a comparison for you, which is entirely subjective and has no guarantee of being in accord with what your own opinions would be. For features Xfce does have more GUI tools though I still prefer Openbox. In theory, GNOME apps probably run slower under Xfce, but because Xfce is generally faster, you are unlikely to notice the difference. XFCE, KDE, Cinnamon, Budgie and Gnome are Beginner Friendly. FREE. Conclusion. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. Anyway, I updated the info in my internal database (brain) and added to mental RAM (can lose it at any moment) -- LOL! Linux Mint MATE is consuming a very low usage of … I'd be interested as to how Xfce performs with older machines as I run fairly recent hardware and in this scenario the speed difference is negligible. XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. 535 . Both DEs provide tons of customizable themes. The difference is on behaviour and philosophy. It seems to have a single app for everything, and nothing really overlaps. After installing openbox, I logged out of the Xfce desktop, and then on the lightdm login screen at the top right corner, I selected an openbox session rather than Xfce. For example, you may compare lxpanel to xfce4-panel, pcmanfm to thunar, lxrandr to xfce4-display-settings and so on... Openbox with the right utilities, tint2, gmrun, etc., like current #!, is very nice and very light, but not the same desktop experience. Xfce is an environment you can scale up or down to fit your tastes. All those things can be added to Openbox but then you end up installing another thing or two. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. In Logiciels libres. Despite the ease of use out of the box.I tried Crunch and Slitaz because of Openbox, not for looks or something. Pros. I think it would be interesting to try XFCE with openbox as the WM, I may have to try that when I get home. You are allowed to change the icon library and fonts in Gnome and XFCE. The unofficial community editions include Awesome, Bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon , i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE, and Openbox. Ces deux dernières années, j’ai essayé pas mal de gestionnaires graphiques, principalement intéressé par ceux qui se présentaient comme très légers, afin de pouvoir les utiliser sur des machines anciennes ou … XFCE is a great DE, it's lightweight and user-friendly. The Xfce in Manjaro looks good thanks to the customization. Or if anyone knows of a good website that does a great comparison of the major WM's that'd be great too. For … But I've ordered a Mint 7 Xfce CD just to compare it for newbie-friendliness with my other Xfce experiences. ☁️ Get $100 in credit toward deploying your very own Linux servers on Linode! Enlightenment vs Openbox. I've tried Zenwalk, Xubuntu 9.10 (wich is faster than 9.04), and I'm not impressed. Partage [AIDE] Choix entre Openbox et XFCE. XFCE's window manager though isn't bad, a little less configurable and less flexible key bindings than Openbox. Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE. Make a backup of your Openbox installation, then install XFCE and if you don't like it, you can restore your Openbox setup easily enough. Sometimes when I'm on other people's computers I right-click only to be disappointed. Somebody completely unfamiliar with Linux can sit down and muddle through XFCE with minimal issues. Native Window Snapping / Window Tiling with Fluxbox, Openbox, and xfwm4 (Xfce) I find tiling helpful when I have to work with the contents of two windows at once, or when comparing things. Benchmark: Memory Usage: LXQt desktop environment vs XFCE. If that is not enough, Manjaro community maintains Awesome, Bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE and Openbox. Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment for UNIX-like operating systems. Now, you could compare LXDE to Xfce. It  's difficult to pinpoint what it is in Openbox what I like so much. LXDE was once my favorite, but don't use anymore. So, you'll have to ask yourself what do you want. License: GPL 2.0 (or later) Programming Language: C. Available on: ArchBang, … Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy. All. I like that its menu and WM features are very customizable. Si tu sais Votre chemin vers Linux Ensuite, vous pouvez Créez votre propre système En utilisant les ingrédients que vous voulez. There is also an element of ease of use. Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features! Fedora 24: Comparing Gnome, KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, LXDE. The most popular desktop environments in Linux are GNOME, Unity, Cinnamon, MATE, KDE, Xfce, and LXDE. For me personally, I prefer openbox because the only thing I miss with it is drive icons on the desktop. The reason I switched to xfce was because I was using some xfce programs anyway. So long story short, I prefer openbox for what most are sure to deem a silly reason, but that's just me . Un bureau Linux léger peut alléger les ressources . LXDE has less utilities and plugins than Xfce, not as eye-candy and less features (matureness) overall. i3 vs Openbox. However, Xfce is flexible and powerful enough to satisfy my needs as a power user. Although it has been few years that I have used Xfce to be honest (I came across it around early 2005 if I remember correctly). If you want something minimalistic, go with Openbox. Cinnamon, Openbox, Awesome, BSPWM, Budgie, MATE and i3 are Manjaro community editions; The official/ flagship editions are supported by the core team of Manjaro Linux. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while still having a beautiful desktop. What's the more selfish thing to do - (a) try it yourself (which takes what... 2 minutes?) LXDE is changing too fast for me to keep up with, but I'd bet that by year's end, at the rate they're going, they could give Xfce a run for it's money in the "lightweight D E" contest. Re: Openbox vs XFCE? An example would be mousepad. Qu'ils utilisent un ordinateur ancien et lent et ont juste besoin d'en tirer le meilleur parti, ou s'ils utilisent un tout nouveau système hautes performances et veulent consacrer toute cette … Xfce embodies the traditional UNIX philosophy of modularity and re-usability. Xfce with Openbox takes less than a minute to set up and functions almost completely glitch-free. They configure a very nice OpenBox and you can see the tools they provide for it and Tint2. It should be noted that Openbox is actually a window manager and must be used in conjunction with one of the desktop environments listed above. I have come to love that personalizable desktop menu in openbox so much that I can't live without it. If we assume for a minute that #! Related Posts . In the next boot, boot to "default". Doesn't work out so well. Re: LXDE vs XFCE Post by ccc » Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:33 am axel668 wrote: If you really can't afford the extra 20MB, you should rather go for Enlightenment (Bodhi) or pure Openbox (Crunchbang) or a specialized distribution for old hardware like Damn Small Linux. 535 . X86 architecture is … What Xfwm has over it, is more options in a GUI (rather than in a config file) and tiling windows by dragging them into screen corners. The next time you log into XFCE, you’ll be using OpenBox as your window manager instead of XFWM4. On the other hand, Openbox uses a very little amount of memory and is very minimalistic (as a DE). However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. In KDE, i noticed there was Kwrite, and Kedit, and maybe some others I haven't noticed. Also it feels more complete, I don't have to build my desktop myself. When I right-click on the Desktop I could see the standard menu (e.g. Proudly powered by Debian. Openbox is only a window manager, very light and efficient but requires more "manual" configuration and extra utilities. to report on my mistake, I must have had a bad … Under Xfce, using Xfwm4+Compton is known to reduce screen-tearing. You won’t find … Re: Openbox vs XFCE? Hi I have a newly installed openSUSE with LXDE desktop, just trying it out. Xfce vs. MATE. Xfce is the oldest of the popular lightweight Linux desktop environments. Au lieu d'installer un environnement de bureau complet, vous pouvez choisir le gestionnaire de fenêtres. Openbox may be a bit lighter in memory usage though both are snappy. This is especially the case if Xfce is run without the Xfce goodies meta plugin package (I only run a  couple of extra plugins). Never . Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. OpenBox solves that problem by being vastly superior in configuration options and versatility. :D. May 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. 214 29 . OpenBox est un environnement de bureau ultra léger, au même titre que Fluxbox ou Xfce. I was using Openbox for some time but I returned to XFCE. I combine Openbox with the XFCE panel . BTW, running an OS on 4MB of RAM, that's impressive! Xfce vs MATE. These two lists show packages that are exclusive to the Xfce and Openbox versions of Manjaro, relative to each other. Manjaro community also maintains ISO for MATE, Cinnamon, LXDE, LXQt, OpenBox and more. Openbox is more lightweight and far more configurable. It’s up to you to decide … And Gnome-Shell uses a brand new WM called 'Mutter', so I'm not sure about its compatibility over other desktops :). Linux Mint with KDE plasma is the best choice for computer or laptop with the high specification. Or try both and choose, Last edited by jotapesse (2010-03-01 15:38:14). make new folder, delete to trash and so on). In its default appearance, the newly-released Xfce … I'm currently running OpenBox and have been for a few months now. IRC: Stalwart @ FreeNodeSkype ID: thestalwartWeeChat-devel nightly packages for i686. All of them offer sophisticated point-and-click graphical user interfaces (GUI) which are on par with the desktop environments found in Windows and Mac OS X. The best I've seen so far has been the LXDE spin of Fedora 12, and I am not normally a fan of Fedora. ^ you know what they say about great minds thinking alike, well, in this case it must of been a fluke! Installation procedure From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional; XFCE: Light, simple, efficient; Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative; KDE: Solid, full-featured, polished; 1. level 2 Not a member of Pastebin yet? It would be no surprise that I prefer Xfce at the moment For me the configurability of Xfce and its ease of use outweigh any speed benefits that may come from using Openbox. See More. XFCE vs GNOME Themes. Anyway, I updated the info in my internal database (brain) and added to mental RAM (can lose it at any moment) -- LOL! Openbox has that ultimate simpleness and straightforwardness.The keyboard use which makes it really fast and snappy.I miss in the comment of oms and core about xfce what they like about it, except configurability and ease of use.But why is that an issue for you who keep tinkering all the time?What are the problems there in Openbox?LXDE is very interesting too. Check the box in the xfce settings to save the session for next boot. 1. If you want something minimalistic, go with Openbox. It all depends on what compromise you want. A DE is a bunch of small programs trying to do many things, with a lot of redundancy. In the question“What are the best window managers for Linux? This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. Xfce is "friendly" enough for many newbies to find their way around, yet still very light and blazing fast even on my old dinosaur. Openbox is only responsible for maintaining the windows you open on your screen -- nothing else. Actually I used LXQt on my Raspberry Pi instead and it works flawlessly. it's probably better to just try it out and see for yourself if you like it or not. I have read that the best implementation of Xfce yet in a Debian-based distro is Linux Mint 7's Xfce community edition. Xfwm uses Xfce as windows manager and LXDE, Openbox. I tested Xubuntu Lucid for several weeks, but the demands on my bandwidth were threatening a FAP violation, so I had to quit. As a side-note, the GNU way of doing things is to have a very small program designed for each function. Gnome, by default, doesn’t display desktop icons. Fortunately, Xfce compensates for this lack by running GNOME apps almost as well as GNOME itself. Bonjour, Je vais réinstaller mon Laptop sous Archlinux ce week end, et j'hésite à propos du choix de l'environnement de bureau :S J'hésite en fait par rapport à ce qui serait le … The load average issue with cinnamon –replace seemed to be resolved and the fans are not blasting into Warp 10 anymore. LXDE Vs XFCE They are not window managers are desktop environments, light, though. And I'm testing the new Xubuntu-Lucid Lynx 10.04 Alpha 2 Lately, it seems lots of people have been comparing KDE to Xfce in my video comments so I thought maybe it would be fun to do a … It is possible to use Openbox as the window manager inside of KDE by simply editing the ~/.xinitrcfile, and replacing the current exec command with the following: Now when issuing startxusers will see KDE, but instead of KWin, they will have the custo… I, by myself, actually run GNOME, KDE, and XFCE on my computers in my office and home. By terminating Xfdesktop… Linux Mint 17.3 will receive security updates until 2019. Trixar_za on "xfce vs openbox" @ms3811, thank you so much for your response, even when the question was asked in a non-related topic forum. ” i3 is ranked 1st while Openbox is ranked 4th. This problem happens now and again, so I have Mate and xfce configured for this … Xfce brings more friendliness and gives a more full-desktop experience. Both have good integration with gtk for drawing a graphical interface, which brings the advantage that most programs use this (without underestimating Qt is also very good). My Recommendation for Openbox. Published: dim. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. Openbox meets these requirements as a window manager, IMO. ^ Xfce, has a right click dynamic menu. So i ask, how are memory usage, and cpu usage in this regard.Also any other little comments you have would be nice to hear (such as why you prefer one to another). To use Xfce4 with Openbox, first start a normal Xfce session, and open up a terminal. My core OS is LinuxMint-8 with Xfce. The next time you log into XFCE, you’ll be using OpenBox as your window manager instead of XFWM4. Also, it doesn’t allow you to drag and drop icons to the desktop. In Linux, there are so many choices, and this includes the desktop environments and window managers.