This new battle? It seems that KDE opted to take the route more often traveled. I find that KDE is nice looking while GNOME has better performance. To make up for lesser configuration, KDE 4 glazes over the desktop with the addition of, yet again, more widgets. Of course my desktop is not everyone's desktop. Good luck to you man But as it stands, I prefer to keep them off my desktop. Same distro (TW), same hardware and drivers combination, what could be the issue with GNOME on OpenSUSE to cause this performance degradation. A renewed war is brewing that should promise to bring with it as much sharp tongue and wit as did emacs/vi. PS5 restock: Here's where and how to buy a PlayStation 5 this week, Review: MacBook Pro 2020 with M1 is astonishing--with one possible deal-breaker, Windows 10 20H2 update: New features for IT pros, Meet the hackers who earn millions for saving the web. I realize that many ... which typically "just work" with Linux, can have some issues with KDE 4. GNOME 3 and Unity can match the performance of the others, but only if you're lucky, so they are tied for third. So consequently, you’ll find performance comparison between Boot-up Times, Memory Usage, System Responsiveness and Shutdown Delay That's the tool they will use more than any other tool. Hello, I want to install TW and I am trying to pick between GNOME and KDE to settle with. On the other hand, on their default settings, KDE offers a more user-friendly environment, especially for th… Naturally, developers are going to leap onto this and create some pretty nifty widgets that might actually add some worth to the whole dashboard metaphor. It seems like only yesterday that I was reading thread after thread of "emacs vs. vi" flame wars. My Gateway pentium 4 1 GB ram, runs Gnome 3.4 just fine. NVdia suggests several performance tweaks to get KDE 4 working with its cards older than GeForce 8. Note: This article is also available as a PDF download. This battle isn't over and will be waged for a long, long time. GNOME? KDE took a solid desktop and pulled the rug out from under it. MATE is supposed to be just like Gnome 2 since Gnome 3 (current version of Gnome) is very different from Gnome 2 and it's lighter than Gnome, Cinnamon or KDE (I think). But while competition will continue to breed innovation, that innovation needs to be forward leaning. Well -- almost. If you tend to have a lot of application launchers on your panel, an already full System Tray could make for a very cluttered panel. Page 1 of 3. Even NVidia cards, which typically "just work" with Linux, can have some issues with KDE 4. If you have an unlimited data plan or you belong to a country where the internet plans are cheap and you use a rolling release Linux distro such as Arch Linux, OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, etc, you won’t be annoyed with the updates of KDE. In GNOME 3, Unity and KDE, a search field is only one click away. Firefox Performance On Wayland Is Looking Good - Browser Benchmarks With KDE vs. GNOME. But with the advent of 4, I have to say GNOME is far ahead of KDE in terms of design, stability, and usability. KDE 4 has gone the way of Windows, locking the user down to limited configuration options with regard to the look and feel of their desktop. The backlash from KDE 4 has been pretty severe. I do understand that there are plenty of people out there (like my wife with OS X) who like to have all those bells and whistles on their desktop. It is a simple file manager for a single directory -- ~/Desktop. Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 25 October 2015. But if you're like me and you use numerous applications, you will quickly have a panel full of launchers. KDE was (and is) the first-ever "Microsofting" of the Linux desktop. I get that, I do. But now, KDE uses Dolphin, which is similar to Nautilus minus the stability. But to port KDE 4 (and its huge code base) to Windows would take a great deal of resources. You will also find that KDE 4 is a bit flakier with video cards. Yes, this instability is due to the immaturity of the code base, and I fully understand and appreciate that. The developers released something that was painfully worthless and refused to listen to the users when the users gave feedback. Critics of Gnome think it just lacks certain functionality. You can even add Emerald and theme KDE 4 to give it the glass feeling of Aero. Don't get me wrong, I am not advocating that the Linux desktop be different just to be different. But even then, you can edit only entries within the Applications tab. With recent versions of Plasma 5, this has returned to the proven stability and polish of KDE 3.x times and so it is again a highly productive and stable desktop. One issue where KDE 4 has bragging rights over its predecessor is memory management. Tech question. This menu style is more in line with what most users are accustomed to, But again, what new user is going to know to right-mouse click the K button to find this? It has add-ons for Dropbox (and integrates with that system seamlessly) and is very stable. See why Jack Wallen believes that today's GNOME has pulled ahead of today's KDE in terms of design, stability, and usability. To edit the main menu, you have to right-click the K button and select Menu Editor. Fedora 23: KDE vs. Xfce vs. GNOME vs. LXDE vs. MATE. This widget is on the KDE 4 desktop by default. With the widgets came clutter. He's covered a variety of topics for over twenty years and is an avid promoter of open source. As mentioned earlier some benchmarks to share this weekend are comparing the out-of-the-box OpenGL graphics performance on Fedora 23 when running some benchmarks under KDE … You will also notice another entry in the K button right-click: Switch To Classic Menu Style. This KDE menu system needs some serious streamlining before it can be considered an efficient use of a desktop. This is a serious problem because KOffice isn't even compatible with Microsoft Office. But even in the name of new users, it seems counterintuitive to the Linux way. Hello, I want to install TW and I am trying to pick between GNOME and KDE to settle with. KDE 4 emulated the OS X dashboard with its plethora of widgets and tiny applications that can do various and sundry tricks, all the while making your desktop a veritable junkyard. By default, the Favorites menu contains System Settings and File Manager. Ubuntu’s Unity desktop features the version 7.4.0, Kubuntu features the KDE Plasma 5.5.5 (and KDE Applications 15.12), and Ubuntu GNOME features GNOME 3.18 release. Linux is about stability and flexibility. That is my opinion while using Mandriva/Mandrake Family of Linux OS's. Ask anyone about Vista, and you're sure to get a negative reaction. It is my opinion that Beagle could be folded into the K menu, and that the Battery and Power applets could easily be one. But I am advocating that the Linux desktop be true to its core. The "then" was when KDE completely trounced GNOME in the desktop war. With KDE 4 came the new file manager, Dolphin. What KDE 4 does allow for is the addition of tons of "things" (widgets, panels, etc). These things should be done correctly upon installation. I have no idea. But that's really where it ends. That was then, this is now. By using our Services, you agree to our use of cookies.Learn More. Dolphin, on the other hand, was an attempt to get away from what was considered the bloatware of Konqueror and to adopt a more simple, streamlined file manager. On my running system, from a fresh log in, KDE reveals 1268876 K memory usage in GNOME vs. 1279348 K memory usage in KDE 4. Linux is Linux, and one of the things that makes it Linux is that it doesn't look or feel like Windows. Don't get me wrong, I think Konqueror is a fine Web browser. I have to admit it would be cool to have a Windows port of KDE. Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 20 April 2020. A new battle is playing out in the Linux desktop arena.  See why Jack Wallen believes that today's GNOME has pulled ahead of today's KDE in terms of design, stability, and usability. But it does show that GNOME requires less hardware to run. Now you might think this is counterintuitive to the whole "efficient workspace" argument I frequently make. GNOME vs. KDE. I realize that many of you are shaking your heads thinking either that battle never got off the ground or it was won long ago. Login or register to post comments Jack Wallen is an award-winning writer for TechRepublic, The New Stack, and Linux New Media. vs. KDE 4's instability. Cookies help us deliver our Services. By default (on a Fedora 10 KDE installation), the following applets are in the System Tray: Sound, Wifi, Klipper, Power, Beagle, Knotify, Battery Monitor, and Clock. Nautilus is a no-frills file manager. Cinnamon was forked from Gnome 3 by the developers of Linux Mint and is kind of like Gnome for people coming from Windows 7, which is … We compare the five leading Linux desktop environments, including GNOME 2.24, on the other hand, uses less memory than KDE 4. I can maybe understand this if you are on a multiuser system, where users depend upon files being rated. Vista has been nothing more than a failure for Microsoft, and KDE 4 seems bent on emulating Vista. Gnome vs. KDE steht in der Linux-Welt für den uralten Kampf der Desktop-Oberflächen. As for XFCE, I found it too unpolished and more simple than it should. Gnome says: ‘KDE!, you fundamentally flawed, practically driven, coarse bonehead!’ … For example, KDE is trying to be practical (or so it seems) by giving solutions to practical problems, and is somewhat neglecting ‘philosophies’ or belief systems in general, Gnome on the other hand, relies on a lot of ideals and is extremely … ... Also interesting was using Xfce on X.Org did deliver higher performance than KDE/GNOME on X11. TechRepublic Premium: The best IT policies, templates, and tools, for today and tomorrow. On the other side of the battlefront, you have GNOME, which is steadfastly moving forward -- the same direction it has been moving for years. Comment and share: 10 reasons why GNOME is better than KDE. If you are the only user on a machine, what use is a file/rating system for your files and directories? Fedora 24: Comparing Gnome, KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, LXDE. Not so. There's no entry in any configuration control panel. But when you are trying to win over users, and show everyone that yes, Linux is just as easy to use as Windows, the last thing you want to do is give them something completely foreign as a Web browser. It has the best performance vs visual look ratio, is the most customizable of the three and have the best applications imo. When you install GNOME 2.24, you'll be using is the newest release with many new additions, but the underpinnings are effectively the same. KDE vs GNOME: Comparison Updates. Take this, for instance: With KDE 4, you have one mouse menu, the left mouse menu, which offers Konsole, Run Command, Desktop Settings, Unlock Widgets, Lock Screen, and Leave. The "now" is GNOME -- and GNOME is slowly but surely pulling ahead of KDE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Without mouse menus, the desktop has become even less efficient. What's your pick? When KDE 4 was first released, it simply wasn't ready. Lately, it seems lots of people have been comparing KDE to Xfce in my video comments so I thought maybe it would be fun to do a … GNOME is generally regarded as streamlined and less resource-intensive than KDE. Gnome vs KDE . Gnome vs KDE . But load time of a System Tray isn't so much the issue -- it's space. Gone were the days of configuring KDE to your exact specifications. Now the "emacs/vi" wars are pretty much over (with no decisive winner ever declared) and with it, most infighting among Linux devotees. You would think that KDE 4 would allow for nearly infinite customization. On top of this, they made KOffice the default office suite. Those were the good old days. What replaced the ever-popular KDE 3.5 was something unstable, hardly usable, and as configurable as Windows Vista. my thinkpad t43 runs slackware with KDE 4.10 good enough too, just all the effects disabled. What is it? But those of us who prefer a workspace that is efficient and clean will want to stay clear of KDE 4. KDE users are estimated 65% of linux desktop users, gnome only takes up to 25% or something, KDE is well overrated, but it remains a matter of opinion, i never did like kde, but that's just ME! Gone is the Winlist desktop menu, where you click a mouse button to see what applications are running (and select a particular program to get focus). Also sometimes one or two CPU cores is stuck in some random process causing heating. When I can open up the file manager and see what is in my ~/Desktop folder without having extra clutter on my desktop, why would I need a widget to do that for me? The widgets included with KDE are fairly useless. The GNOME desktop environment receives fewer updates in the year compared to KDE. I would like to think that Dolphin would lend file/directory tags to the KDE search engine, but it does not. And when you're running the desktop, you can certainly tell the difference between a default GNOME 2.24 and a KDE 4.1 desktop. If I had to guess, I would probably say that a huge majority of Linux users have used The default desktop packages from the Fedora 32 repository … KDE 4 was a complete redesign, from the ground up, of KDE -- and it showed. Mit diesem Vergleich der beiden Kandidaten geben wir Ihnen einen Überblick über die Unterschiede bei der Oberfläche, der … To open an application, you then must click on the Applications tab, navigate to the category the target application will belong to, find the application entry, and click on it. Considering how far KDE 4 has to go before it is truly production ready, I think redirecting any viable resource away from the main project would be a mistake. A new battle is playing out in the Linux desktop arena. KDE 4 has also removed the ability to add mouse menus. What's worse, at least for the new user, is that finding the menu editor tool is not intuitive. The OS X interface doesn't share much with Windows, and neither should a Linux desktop. What they have created is a file manager that has features most will find worthless. But the new user doesn't want to have to install and set a default application right off the bat. With GNOME, you can pretty much do whatever you want with your desktop. You know how it seems like a never-ending lineup of System Tray applets will load and load and load and load with Windows?. The most popular desktop environments in Linux are 45 Comments. Try opening up .ppt files in KOffice and see what happens. Eu amo o KDE, mas poderia usar o Gnome tranquilamente; não sei mas deve ter sido por conta do Ubuntu e suas extensões, mas o desempenho em meu ideapad 310 não foi muito bom, mas só testei o 17.10 eu acho… Fedora já testei, cheguei a usar, acho o Gnome muito bonito no Fedora. So honestly, I can't think of a justifiable reason for adding bloat to an application that was supposed to be free from bloat. Take for instance a file/directory rating and comment system. karatedog wrote i'm a desktop linux newcomer although a bit experienced in servers with command line tools as i installed ubuntu it come with gnome i installed the os on KDE vs GNOME • KDE Community Forums At least GNOME has the intelligence to make Firefox the default Web browser and OpenOffice the default office suite. When you have a Web browser available that is giving Internet Explorer a serious run for its money, AND is one of the best browsers available, why not make that the default? GNOME vs. KDE. It does one thing and it does it well: It manages files. When KDE 4 was built, it was created on Qt 4 in the hopes that KDE could (and would) be ported to other platforms (such as Windows and OS X). In Linux, there are so many choices, and this includes the desktop environments and window managers. Why? The original default file manager, Konqueror, was moved over to act as the default Web browser. With the advent of KDE 4 came the widgets. I've used all three and liked KDE the most. GNOME 2.24 continues to use GTK+ 2 but includes flags in the code to enforce stricter compatibility with the upcoming GTK+ 3.These flags are included so that when GTK+ 3 is put in production use, the transition for developers will be seamless. Because of this, the latest GNOME is still stable (even while containing flags for the migration to a new foundation.) That is a change of 10472 K. Granted, this is not a huge difference. How could this happen? This can be made irrelevant by adding an application launcher widget to the panel. KDE e GNOME sono due ambienti desktop (raccolta di software che forniscono certe funzionalità e un aspetto per i sistemi operativi) che vengono eseguiti su sistemi operativi che utilizzano X Window System (principalmente Unix, Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD e Mac OS X). KDE 4 will give those people plenty to play with. Prior to 4, I would have picked KDE over GNOME any day. But why? You can change the size of your panel and reposition it. Once again, this comparison touches on only the surface of the differences and similarities between Gnome and KDE. Interestingly, while GNOME’s minimum system requirements are less demanding as far as CPU speed is concerned (700 Mhz, vs KDE’s 1 Ghz requirement), KDE actually requires less minimum RAM (615 MB vs GNOME’s 768 MB). As you can see, both offer … A highly personal take on KDE vs. Gnome over two decades. Gnome is too buggy and consumes A LOT of RAM. With the final release of Fedora 24 arriving on Tuesday, I've installed each of the six desktops on a different laptop or netbook. KDE 4 (at least in its current state) goes very much against that, whereas GNOME (in its current state) holds true to those values. That is the Linux way. With this change, KDE had to be completely rebuilt. KDE 4, on the other hand, has an incredibly clumsy menu. Unless you add a theme to KDE 4 you can't change the look of your panel. KDE and GNOME are two desktop environments (collection of software that provides certain functionality and a look and feel for operating systems) that run on operating systems that use X Window System (mostly Unix, Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, and Mac OS X). It should be pretty obvious what you can find from each one. The biggest difference is that the GNOME System Tray loads instantly (allowing Power and Wifi to come up as detected), whereas KDE's System Tray loads up one after another. But again with your computer you wont even notice any different in performance. This was a huge change from the previous Qt 3. Finding an Application or File. Power, Wifi, User Switcher, Clock, and Sound. According to the developers, KDE 4 uses approximately 39% less memory than KDE 3.5 does. I am currently staring at a KDE 4 desktop with a single widget, Desktop, that is doing nothing. Not so with GNOME. With GNOME, there are three simple menus from the main panel: Applications, Places, and Administration. If you click on the K menu, you will initially see five tabs: Favorites, Applications, Computer, Recently Used, and Leave. Of course, you can change the KDE 4 defaults. This reason (nay, the entire article) could end with three letters and a number "KDE 4." How bug bounties are changing everything about security, The best headphones to give as gifts during the 2020 holiday season. Verdict: If you only consider defaults, GNOME 2 is the winner, followed by KDE. Fans of Gnome think the simplicity of Gnome offers a cleanliness that allows the user to get stuff done. Prior to this change, KDE had the best graphical file manager available on ANY operating system -- Konqueror. Well, read on to find out exactly why today's GNOME (>= 2.22) is better than today's KDE (>=4.1). The thing is, although I prefer the simplicity and visuals of GNOME over KDE, the performance of GNOME on both my laptops is quite bad, there's noticeable lag in moving things around, and as time goes by and I start to open windows/tabs, the GNOME Shell crawls to a point where it is using a lot of RAM and I must logout and login again to stabilize things. It should also be fairly obvious that navigating these menus is efficient and as simple as it is elegant. This is typical bloat in the KDE 4 desktop that isn't limited to just the System Tray, but the System Tray is a perfect example. The first versions of Plasma were a huge step backwards in usability, performance, and stability. So far this has not happened on the times I have tried KDE. As stated earlier, the default file manager in KDE 4 is not good. © 2020 ZDNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. Performance of GNOME vs KDE. One of the nice things about the typical Linux desktop is that it lends itself to customizations that can fit almost any need.